To do
Urgent
- Re-assign Mamiellophyceae with updated PR2
- Plot ratio of auto/total euks or auto/hetero
Other
- Treemap comparing overall composition of Johor vs Singapore (better than the bargraphs)
- Regroup Singapore and Raffles Marina for the barplots (Figure 5.1)
- Do heatmaps per group (Chloro, diatoms, dinos)
- Classify 16S plastid using PhytoRef
Methodology
- For assignation with Wang assigner, only ASVs with bootstrap at super group level taked into account
- Metazoa and Fungi not taken into account
- Abundant" OTUs are more than 10% in at least one sample
- Some samples for which the quality of sequencing was bad have been removed (Caroline list)
- Samples have been normalized to the medium number of reads for the group considered (e.g. for all eukaryotes or for all photosynthetic eukaryotes)
Basic statistics
- 663 ASVs of which 267 are autotrophs
- 81 samples
Taxonomic composition
- Dinoflagellates are dominating followed by diatoms (Figure 5.1)
- Among the key genera/species there are clear differences between Johor and Singapore (Raffles should merged with Singapore probably for this kind of comparison)
- Dinos (Figure 5.7): Gyrodinium fusiforme (Johor), Gyrodinium gutrula; Woloszeunskia halophila (Johor), Karlodinium veneficum (Singapore)
- Diatoms (Figure 5.8): Most diatoms are on the Johor side except for Leptocylindrus, Chaetoceros (endosymbiont), Cyclotella (Johor), Carataulina (Johor), Thalassiosira, Shionodiscus
- Chlorophyta (Figure 5.5, 5.6, 5.4): Nanochloris (Picochlorum, mostly in Johor), Micromonas clade A.ABC.1-2 (M. commoda, mostly Singapore), Micromonas clade lagoons (in fact we call it warm now, mostly Singapore), Ostreococcus clade A (lucimarinus) and tauri
- Crypto (Figure 5.3): Geminigera (Singapore)
Effect of different factors on eukaryote composition
- Radiolaria, Cryptophyta, Ciliophora, Cercozoa only found in Singapore strait and Raffles (Figure 6.1)
- Monsoon has less effect on the overall composition… (Figure 6.3)
Query: should we do just on the Photosynthetic eukaryotes or all eukaryotes ?
NMDS
- The strait seems to be most discriminant factor (Figure 7.1).
- However it is interesting that for eukaryotes (Figure 7.2) Raffles Marina seems to be clustering with Singapore straight rather than Johor most of the time while for prokaryotes (Figure 7.1), Raffles is clearly in between. Probably an interesting point to discuss.
Comparison with OSD
- OSD V4 while Singkaryotes amplicon is more upstream. There is no overlap between the two regions so for Mamiellophyceae the comparison is difficult with the new clades defined by Margot (e.g. clade E for Ostreococcus)
Mamiellophyceae
- Investigate in more details the Mamiellophyceae based on master alignement (clades). Check in particular whether we have Ostreo lucimarinus or Ostreo claude B
OSD
Species/clades in bold are found in both OSD and Singkaryotes
| Micromonas commoda AB |
36.33 |
| Bathycoccus prasinos |
10.20 |
| Ostreococcus clade B |
9.90 |
| Micromonas clade B warm I |
5.31 |
| Micromonas clade B warm II |
4.80 |
| Ostreococcus clade E |
3.62 |
Singkaryote data set
Bathycoccus prasinos
Micromonas commoda AB
Micromonas clade B warm
Ostreo clade B
Ostreo sp. -> This may correspond to Ostreo clade E
Ochrophyta
Seems coherent
* Singkaryote, Diatoms (super dominant), Chrysophyceae, Raphidophyceae
* OSD: Diatoms are also dominant follwoed by Chrysophyceae and Raphodophyceae
Haptophyta
Seems coherent
* Singkaryote, Chrysochromulina, Emiliana, Haptolina, Phaeocystis
* OSD : Chrysochromulina, Phaeocystis, Haptolina, Emiliana